Renteria et al v. Canepa
Denise Renteria, Oscar Renteria and Renteria Family Trust |
Eugene Cleveland Canepa |
3:2011cv00534 |
July 26, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Howard D. McKibben |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 ORDER SETTING EXAMINATION OF JONATHAN S. STEELE, CPA and ENNIS JORDAN re 74 Proposed Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 02/05/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 73 ORDER granting 68 Second Motion for Supplementary Proceedings. Plaintiffs shall submit proposed order identifying time and place for examinations of Jonathan Steele and Ennis Jordan by 2/4/2014. Please see attached for further details. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/31/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 61 ORDER granting 36 Motion for Charging Order; granting 39 Motion for Sanctions; and granting 49 Motion for Attorney Fees. Eugene Cleveland Canepa's stock in FQ Men's Club, Inc. and Monkey Bars, Inc. is CHARG ED to satisfy judgment. Eugene Cleveland Canepa's membership interest in Western Properties of Nevada is CHARGED to satisfy judgment. Attorney's fees awarded in favor of Renteria Family Trust and against Eugene Cleveland Canepa in amount of $12,677.50. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/19/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 46 ORDERED the # 31 Motion to Set Aside Judgment is DENIED. The # 40 Motion to File Surreply is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that the # 14 Motion for Attorney's Fees is DENIED. Plaintiffs may submit a renewed motion for fees with proper documentation by 3/20/2013. FURTHER ORDERED the # 37 Motion for Status Conference is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/5/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting 24 Motion for Judgment Debtor Exam. Defendant Eugene Cleveland Canepa shall appear at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, November 12, 2012, at the offices of Holland & Hart, LLP, 5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor, Reno, Nevada 89511 to answe r questions regarding assets and his means of paying judgment. A copy of this order shall be personally served upon judgment debtor at least fourteen (14) calendar days before the hearing scheduled herein and proof of service filed with the Court. Failure to appear may subject debtor to punishment for contempt of court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 23 ORDER denying without prejudice 19 Plaintiffs' Application for Order Setting Judgment Debtor Exam. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/4/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ) |
Filing 12 ORDERED that Plaintiff's # 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED on the basis of breach of contract. Plaintiff shall be awarded the full contractual amount of $845,000, plus $115,767.12 in interest accrued between May 20 10 and July 2011, and $38,103.15 in late fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may submit a Motion for Attorney's Fees in accordance with Rule 54. The Clerk shall enter the judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/3/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.