Junas v. Advantix Lending, Inc. et al
| Joy L. Junas |
| Advantix Lending, Inc., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Fidelity National Title, First American Title Insurance Company, Charlotte Olmos and ReconTrust Company N.A. |
| 3:2011cv00566 |
| August 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDERED that Ds' # 3 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. P's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORD that Ds' # 3 Request to expunge lis pendens in the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD that in accordance with the # 20 O ffer of Judgment and the # 16 Notice of Acceptance, judgment shall be entered against Fidelity National Title in the amount of $10.00. The judgment is not to be construed as an admission that Fidelity National Title is liable in this action. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/21/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Fidelity National Title's 20 Offer of Judgment is deemed accepted by Plaintiff, but judgment will not be entered at this time. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 2/15/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
