Noriega v. La Grand et al
| Jose Noriega |
| Robert La Grand and Nevada Attorney General |
| Catherine Cortez-Masto |
| 3:2011cv00611 |
| August 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER DISMISSING 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. FURTHER ORDERED petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. FURTHER ORDERED Clerk shall enter judgment and close case. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this order, respondents shall file a status report to inform this court of the status of petitioner's state petition for postconviction relief.(Status Report due by 6/16/2012.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/16/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING 10 Motion for docketing statement. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall send 1 copy of docket sheet to P at his address of record. ( PACER docket sheet mailed to P 11/2/2011. ) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/31/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
