Mizzoni v. Brooks et al
Plaintiff: Joseph L. Mizzoni
Defendant: Reney Baker, Debbra Brooks, Heybar, Dr Koehn, Magakran and E.K. McDaniel
Case Number: 3:2011cv00632
Filed: September 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER adopting and accepting 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and granting 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
September 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDERED Ds' # 17 Motion to file Exhibits A and B in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment under seal is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/19/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER. Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is GRANTED;however, plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $37.52 toward the full filing fee of three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00). Plaintiff shall have thirty ( 30) days from the date this order is entered in which to have the designated fee sent to the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall SEND plaintiff two copies of this order. Plaintiff is ordered to make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of thi s order attached to the check in the amount of the designated fee (SENT). the Nevada Department of Corrections shall pay to the Court, 20% of the preceding month's deposits to plaintiff's account (Joseph L. Mizzoni #68549), in the mon ths that the account exceeds $10.00, until the full $350.00 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk of the Court shall SEND a copy of this order to the FinanceDivision of the Clerks Office (SENT). The Clerk shall also SEND a cop y of this order to the attention of the Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections (SENT). The Clerk shall DETACH and FILE the complaint (FILED). The Clerk shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order, a copy of the courts Screening Order 4 and a copy of plaintiffs complaint [1-1] on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada, attention Pamela Sharp (ACK'D). The Attorney Generals Office shall advise the court within twenty-one (21) days of the da te of the entry of this order whether it can accept service of process for the named defendants. As to any of the named defendants for which the Attorney Generals Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last known addres s(es) of those defendant(s). If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plaintiff shall file a Motion identifying the unserved defendant(s). If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such de fendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of all pleadings upon defendants.(Payment of filing fees due 3/7/2012. Notice of Compliance is due by 2/27/2012., Responses due by 4/6/2012.) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 2/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mizzoni v. Brooks et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reney Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Debbra Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heybar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr Koehn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Magakran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E.K. McDaniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph L. Mizzoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?