Knox v. McDaniels
Petitioner: Monteneque N. Knox
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General and E.K. McDaniels
Case Number: 3:2011cv00682
Filed: September 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER denying petitioner's 27 motion for immediate release; denying in its entirety 6 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus; denying a certificate of appealability. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/30/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
March 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDERED that P's # 18 Motion to amend petition is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORD that by 4/27/2013 P shall file a new motion to amend petition and attach a proposed second amended petition, if he chooses to file a second amended peti tion. FURTHER ORD that if P chooses not to seek to file a second amended petition, that this case shall proceed on the # 6 Amended petition and # 7 Answer. FURTHER ORD that P's # 20 Ex Parte Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 1 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition 3 upon the respondents (Sent). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents sh all have forty-five (45) days to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have forty five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall serve upon the Attorney General a copy of every pleading, motion, or other document.(Answer due 12/2/2011. Responses due by 12/2/2011.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 10/17/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knox v. McDaniels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Represented By: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: E.K. McDaniels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Monteneque N. Knox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?