Sandoval v. LeGrand et al
Daniel G. Sandoval |
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General |
Catherine Cortez-Masto |
3:2011cv00799 |
November 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Larry R. Hicks |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER - Petitioner's # 23 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 40 ORDER granting 38 motion for partial dismissal. Ground 2 is dismissed with prejudice. Respondents to answer the remaining claims within 30 days (by 2/15/2014); petitioner to reply 30 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 01/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 37 ORDER granting in part 28 Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner shall have 30 days to file a motion for dismissal, partial dismissal, and/or other appropriate relief (due by 10/24/2013). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 09/24/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 27 ORDERED P' s # 18 Motion to toll the statute of limitations is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORD that, to the extent that leave of court was required to file the second amended petition under Rule 15(a), such leave is granted nunc pro tunc. FURTHER ORD that Rs shall have until 11/25/2012 to respond, to the # 23 Second amended petition. FURTHER ORD that any procedural defenses raised by Rs in this case shall be raised together in a single consolidated motion to dismiss. FURTHER ORD tha t, in any answer filed on the merits, Rs shall specifically cite to and address the applicable state court written decision and state court record materials, regarding each claim within the response as to that claim. FURTHER ORD that counsel addition ally shall send a hard copy of all exhibits filed to, for this case, the Las Vegas Clerk's Office. FURTHER ORD that P shall have 30 days from service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/25/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 11 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender's Office is appointed as counsel for petitioner, with Debra A. Bookout, Esq., appearing as petitioner's counsel of record. FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner shall have until up to and includ ing February 1, 2012, within which to file a first amended petition, with an opportunity for further leave to amend thereafter. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the CJA Coordinator for this Division. (Clerk placed copy of this Order in CJA Coordinator mailbox.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/10/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) |
Filing 9 ORDERED that, consistent with the Court's prior order, the Clerk of Court shall enter the FPD provisionally as counsel of record and shall direct a notice of electronic filing of both this order and the prior order and attachments to the FPD. ( E-service 12/20/2011; NEF re-generations 12/20/2011.) IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that, given that time frequently is of the essence with regard to orders such as the one entered previously herein, the Clerk is requested and directed to undertake a review of procedures to assure that effective procedures are being followed in this regard. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the FPD shall file a response to the Court's prior order (# 3 , at 4, lines 1-3) within fourteen (14) days of entry of this order. I T FURTHER IS ORDERED that, contingent upon the FPD being able to undertake representation in this matter, P shall have up to and including February 1, 2012, within which to file an amended petition. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/20/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.