Ferring B.V. v. Apotex, Inc. et al
Ferring B.V. |
Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp. |
Ferring B.V. |
Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp. |
3:2011cv00854 |
November 25, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Larry R. Hicks |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 JUDGMENT 1. This action is dismissed pursuant to the stipulation of Apotex made on the record and incorporated by reference and filed under seal. 2. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys/ fees. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/24/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 39 ORDERED that the # 313 Motion to Amend is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD that the # 321 Motion to Amend is DENIED. FURTHER ORD that the Motions to Seal (## 312 , 322 , 327 ) are GRANTED. (Referenced doc. nos. filed in base case 3:11-cv-00481) Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 37 ORDERED that the # 265 Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order ( filed in case 3:11-cv-00481 ) are DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 36 ORDER re Claim Construction : The disputed terms are construed as specified herein. ( See order for specifics. ) Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/6/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.