Navas v. Byron et al
| Julio Cesar Navas |
| Carol Stokes, Mario Palacios, David S. Rankine, Alicia Delgado, Richard A. Gammick, Ronald A. Longtin, Jr., Deborah Schumacher, Anna Marie Byron and Western Title Co. |
| 3:2011cv00868 |
| December 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE re Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 9 First Amended Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 04/09/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDERED the# 3 R&R is adopted and accepted, and P's # 1 IFP application is GRANTED. The full filing fee of $350.00 shall still be due. FURTHER ORD the Clerk shall file the complaint (# 1 -1). FURTHER ORD claims are DISMISSED WITH or WITHO UT PREJUDICE as specified herein. ( See pdf order for specifics. ) FURTHER ORD that P's # 1 -2 Motion for counsel is DENIED. FURTHER ORD that the Clerk shall send to P a blank 1983 form with instructions and a copy of the original complaint. (Form, inst, and cmplt mailed to P 7/30/2012. ) P's amended complaint is due within 30 days from date of this order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/27/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
