Harris v. Legarnde et al
| Gregory L. Harris |
| Robert Legarnde and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2012cv00042 |
| January 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS ORDERED that the 6 Petition is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely. FURTH ORD that P is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. FURTH ORD that Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk shall DETACH, FILE andELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (ECF #1-1) upon the respondents (Ack'd).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall DETACH and FILE petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel [1-2] (Ack'd). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the entry of this order to show cause and file such proof he may have to demonstrate that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was timely filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner files proof to demonstrate that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was timely filed, respondents shall have twenty (20) days to file a response to petitioner's proof. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner is unable to demonstrate that the petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed within the limitations period, the court will enter an order dismissing thepetition. (Notice of Compliance is due by 4/1/2012.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/2/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date this order is entered to either (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee or (2) submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, including a financial certific ate. Failure to take one of these actions within the timeallowed may result in dismissal of this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall SEND to petitioner the approved form for an application to proceed in forma pauperis (Sent). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall SEND to petitioner two copies of this order (Sent). If petitioner wishes to pay the five dollar ($5) filing fee, petitioner must make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this order, along with a check in the amount of $5.00 filing fee, sent to the court. (Payment of filing fees due 3/7/2012. Notice of Compliance is due by 3/7/2012.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
