Pegram v. Jamgotchian Featured Case

Defendant: Jerry Jamgotchian
Plaintiff: Michael E Pegram
Case Number: 3:2012cv00050
Filed: January 25, 2012
Court: Nevada District Court
Office: Reno Office
Referring Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

We have record of the following docket entries for this case:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 25, 2012 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from Ninth Judicial District Court, Case Number 11-cv-0383, (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0978-2252156), filed by Jerry Jamgotchian. Certificate of Interested Parties due by 2/4/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Summons, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Smith, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pegram v. Jamgotchian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerry Jamgotchian
Represented By: James Robert Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael E Pegram
Represented By: Patricia K Lundvall
Represented By: Megan L Starich
Represented By: Richard C. Yarmuth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?