Quintero v. Palmer et al
| John Randall Quintero |
| Nevada Attorney General, Jack Palmer and Howard Skolnik |
| 3:2012cv00146 |
| March 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER denying Petitioner's 43 and 53 motions; granting 48 motion to withdraw - no action will be taken on 42 motion for clarification; denying 59 motion to take judicial notice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/26/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER - Petitioner's 26 motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Petitioner's 29 and 32 motions to order the State of Nevada to submit exhibits of the state evidentiary hearing into the record are DENIED as moot. Petitioner's 30 motio n for leave to file a response to respondents' reply is DENIED. Respondents' 38 motion to strike is GRANTED. The clerk of the court shall STRIKE petitioner's 37 response to state reply. Respondents' 10 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for petitioner's failure to exhaust his available state-court remedies. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 08/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
