Rowell v. Wolfson Featured Case

Petitioner: Lamarr Rowell
Respondent: Steve Wolfson
Case Number: 3:2012cv00244
Filed: May 4, 2012
Court: Nevada District Court
Office: Reno Office
Referring Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

We have record of the following docket entries for this case:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 4, 2012 Case assigned to District Judge Larry R. Hicks and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ)
May 4, 2012 2 NOTICE to Plaintiff from USDC advising case against defendant Wolfson, et al. has been received and assigned case number 3:12-cv-00244. (Inmate #*61987*) (DRM)
May 4, 2012 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Lamarr Rowell. Motion ripe 5/4/2012. ( Attachments: # 1 Petition, # 2 Motion for Counsel )(DRM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowell v. Wolfson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lamarr Rowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steve Wolfson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?