Reberger v. Koehn et al
Lance Reberger |
Renee Baker, R. Bruce Bannister, ESP Medical Dept. and Michael Koehn |
3:2012cv00284 |
May 29, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Larry R. Hicks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDERED that the # 7 Motion to withdraw the emergency motion is GRANTED. The # 6 Motion for copywork is DENIED AS MOOT. FURTHER ORDERED that action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/22/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting 4 Motion to Extend Time. Complaint shall be filed by 8/13/2012. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/12/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis shall be temporarily deferred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Clerk shall send to plaintiff a form and instructions for filing a section 1983 civil rights complaint (Sent). Plaintif f shall have thirty days to file the complaint,which shall be identified with the case number assigned to this action. Thereafter, the court will consider the complaint and emergency motion.(Complaint deadline: 7/6/2012.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/5/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.