Newmont Nevada Energy Investment, LLC v. Sierra Pacific Power Company
| Newmont Nevada Energy Investment, LLC |
| Sierra Pacific Power Company |
| 3:2012cv00349 |
| June 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER Motion to Remand to State Court 6 is GRANTED; Motion to Dismiss 3 and Motion for Leave to File 22 are DENIED AS MOOT. (Certified copy of this order and copy of docket sheet sent to Second Judicial District Court.) Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/20/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that oral argument on 3 6 set for Tuesday, September 18, 2012 is VACATED. The court will issue a written order on the pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ON STIPULATION GRANTING 15 Stipulation. The parties stipulate that the opposition to the Motion to Dismiss 3 and Motion to Remand 6 shall be filed by 08/17/2012. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 8/17/2012.) Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
