Penny v. Warden
| State of Nevada |
| Wil P. Penny |
| Warden |
| 3:2012cv00420 |
| August 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER DENYING 9 Motion for relief from order. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall identify P as a restricted filer on the docket sheet and shall return all further papers, other than a notice of appeal, submitted by petitioner for this action unfiled to petitioner. This action remains closed. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 1/29/2013 (DRM).
|
|
Filing
8
ORDERED that # 6 Motion for judgment as matter of law, and # 7 Motion for relief from order are DENIED. This action remains closed. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/24/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the petition is DIMISSED without prejudice to the filing a new petition in a new action under a new docket number with either payment of the filing fee or a properly completed pauper application. The Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
