Christensen v. Palmer et al
| Derek Christensen |
| Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer |
| 3:2012cv00477 |
| September 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSEDWITHOUT PREJUDICE AS UNEXHAUSTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 03/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER - Clerk shall electronically serve 5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (E-Service conducted on 12/11/12). FURTHER ORD the petitioner shall have until 1/9/13 to file a second amended petition. Petitioner's failure to comply in a timely manner will result in dismissal of his petition. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/10/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JK)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER directing filing of 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in a new separate case (Original Case 3:12-cv-274-RCJ-VPC). Please see attached for specific details. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/6/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
