Provenzano v. LeGrande et al
Paul Provenzano |
Robert LeGrande and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2012cv00500 |
September 18, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Larry R. Hicks |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/14/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 7 ORDER Clerk shall file and electronically serve petition 1 -1 upon respondents. Respondents to answer or otherwise respond within 45 days. Petitioner shall have 45 days from service of answer to file reply. Please see attached for further details. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/12/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 5 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner shall have 30 days to show cause and file such proof he may have to demonstrate that the petition was timely filed within the one-year time limitation or that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the time period. FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner is unable to demonstrate that the petition was filed within the limitations period, the court will enter an order dismissing the petition. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/08/2012.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.