Newport v. Marconato et al
Plaintiff: |
Joshua A. Newport |
Defendant: |
Fye, Ginchereau, Hammerstone, Lake, Maile, Marconato, Marsh, Novak, Rowe, Sparks, City Of, Tracy and Bryan Yee |
Case Number: |
3:2012cv00621 |
Filed: |
November 26, 2012 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Office: |
Reno Office |
Presiding Judge: |
William G. Cobb |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert C. Jones |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
May 31, 2016 |
Filing
100
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice re ECF No. 98 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/31/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
March 28, 2016 |
Filing
90
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion is granted as to claims against City of Sparks, Officer Marconato, Officer Yee, and Sergeant Tracy. Clerk to enter judgment in favor of these Defendants. Motion is denied with respect to Officer Rowe as to his use of chokehold and Officer Lake as to second firing of taser. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/28/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
October 8, 2014 |
Filing
44
ORDER Motion for leave to amend 40 is granted in part and denied in part. Motion is granted with respect to adding City of Sparks as Defendant. Clerk shall detach proposed Third Amended Complaint 40 -1 and file it. Predecessor moti on to amend 35 is denied as moot. Defendants' counsel shall file statement within 10 days whether counsel can accept service on behalf of City of Sparks. The court vacates Scheduling Order 37 . Motion to extend discovery deadline is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/8/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
August 15, 2014 |
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING as moot # 34 Motion for an Order setting schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/15/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
July 29, 2014 |
Filing
32
ORDER denying as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss; granting 23 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint; and denying as moot 30 Motion to Strike. Clerk directed to file second amended complaint 23 -1. Defendants shall file answer within 14 days. Please see attached for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 7/29/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
February 11, 2014 |
Filing
20
ORDER denying without prejudice 17 Motion to Amend; granting Plaintiff's request for a 60-day extension of time to respond to 14 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's response due by 3/10/2014. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 02/11/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
November 26, 2013 |
Filing
9
ORDER Amended complaint 5 may proceed against defendant officers in their individual capacities. Order on Motion/Application to Proceed in forma pauperis 3 is amended to reflect that monthly payments due until filing fee paid in full (copy of order sent to finance dept via NEF and chief of inmate services via USPS on 11/26/13). Clerk ordered to issue summons to each defendant and deliver to US Marshal for service. Clerk should send Plaintiff sufficient copies of amended complaint and USM-285 forms for each defendant (sent 11/26/13). Please see attached for further details regarding service and deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 11/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
November 28, 2012 |
Filing
3
ORDER GRANTING 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed IFP. Clerk is instructed to DETACH and FILE the Complaint (# 1 -1). The Complaint should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. P shall have 45 days to amend his Complaint if he so chooses. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 11/28/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?