Cottle v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
| Sean D. Cottle |
| Robert Bannister, James Cox and Nevada Department of Corrections |
| 3:2012cv00645 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 9/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
173
ORDER accepting and adopting in full ECF No. 172 R&R; granting ECF No. 166 Motion to Withdraw ECF Nos. 134 , 146 , and 151 Motions for Reconsideration/Relief from Judgment; dismissing with prejudice this action; directing Clerk to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/13/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER granting # 159 Motion to Seal Transcript. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER granting 136 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
117
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr, on 6/25/2015, granting Plaintiff's 115 Motion; directing Clerk to send 114 NEF to Plaintiff (mailed 6/26/2015). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
102
MINUTE ORDER STAYING CASE. In view of the pending settlement, briefing on all outstanding motions (Doc. ## 73 , 97 , 100 and 101 ) in this matter is STAYED. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/5/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
89
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 12/20/2013, denying Plaintiff's 83 Motion for Transcript. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER adopting and accepting in full 68 Report and Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 57 motion to amend; granting 58 and 59 motions; denying as moot 39 motion to reconsider. The clerk shall file the 57 -1 Amended Complaint and attach the 1 -7, 1 -8, and 1 -9 exhibits from the initial complaint. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER denying 54 and 55 Motions to Compel; and granting 56 Motion to Compel. Please see attached for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/30/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 40 Motion for an Examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/24/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
36
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 8/30/2013, denying 35 motion for order staying discovery. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER denying 19 Motion to amend complaint; denying as moot 20 Motion for leave to extend parts B, C on amended complaint and 21 Motion for leave to add the previous exhibits from original complaint to amended complaint. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 08/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
