Wenzel v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Theresa Wenzel |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel |
| 3:2013cv00074 |
| February 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM G. COBB ECF No. 39 ; Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees ECF No. 36 is granted; Plaintiff's counsel is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $13,000 with an offset to Wenzel of $3,700 for the fees awarded under the EAJA; Plaintiff's counsel is directed to reimburse Plaintiff the amount of $3,700.00. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
30
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 8/15/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER re attached LR 7-6(b) query : The pending matters in this case do not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending motions in civil cases. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/9/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Main Document 27 replaced on 12/10/2015) (DRM).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
