McIntyre v. Baca et al
| Richard Clifford McIntyre |
| Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2013cv00079 |
| February 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER denying 5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/15/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER - Petitioner's # 16 Motion for counsel is denied. Further ordered Petitioner's # 15 Motion to stay ruling is denied. Further ordered Respondents' # 7 Motion to dismiss is granted. (see pdf order for specifics re Grounds 4 and 5) Further ordered answer due by 5/10/2014; reply due 45 days after service of answer. Further ordered no action need be taken on petitioner's # 24 Motion for clarification. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/26/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER directing that from this date forward, the hard copy of any exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/12/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
