Aviles-Perez v. LeGrand et al
Petitioner: Alejandro Aviles-Perez
Respondent: Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2013cv00173
Filed: April 8, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying 16 First Amended Petition. Petitioner is granted a certificate of appealability with respect to Grounds 1E, 2, and 5. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/25/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
November 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: From this date forward, the hard copy of any exhibits shall be forwarded -- for this case -- to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/08/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - Counsel for petitioner shall meet with petitioner as soon as reasonably possible, if counsel has not already done so (see order for details). The Clerk shall electronically serve a copy of this order and of the 1 -1 through 1 -3 original p etition upon respondents (served 9/16/2013). Respondents to appear in this action within 10 days. Petitioner must have 90 days to file and serve an amended petition. Respondents shall have 30 days which to answer or otherwise respond. If no amende d petition filed, respondents shall have 30 days from the date on which the amended petition is due within which to answer or otherwise respond to petitioner's original petition. If and when respondents file an answer, petitioner shall have 30 days to reply. Counsel for respondents must make available to counsel for petitioner copies of whatever portions of the state court record they possess regarding the judgment petitioner is challenging in this case. Any state court record exhibits m ust be filed with a separate index of exhibits. The CM/ECF attachments that are filed must further be identified by the number or numbers of the exhibits in the attachment. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits must be forwarded for this case to the staff attorneys in Reno. (Amended Petition due by 12/15/2013.) Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 09/16/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aviles-Perez v. LeGrand et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alejandro Aviles-Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert LeGrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?