Lunford v. Flores et al
| Darren Lunford |
| D.W. Neven and Randy Flores |
| 3:2013cv00282 |
| May 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER RE: INFORMAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS : The court finds the parties will benefit from informal discussions in an effort to settle the case; and encourages the parties to engage in such discussions. A courtesy copy of this order and the co mplaint shall be provided to Ds' counsel by the Clerk. ( E-service of courtesy copy of Order, and courtesy copy of Complaint via NEF-regeneration, performed on 1/28/2014. ) If parties unable to settle then P will have to pay the $350 filing fee in full. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER deferring decision on the 1 application to proceed IFP. The clerk shall file the complaint. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint (see order for instructions). The clerk shall send form and instructions to plaintiff (mailed 11/18/2013). (Amended Complaint deadline: 12/18/2013.) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
