Wingo v. Baca et al
Petitioner: Kirk D. Wingo
Respondent: Isidrio Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2013cv00443
Filed: August 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Howard D. McKibben
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER - The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Petitioner's motion for a status check of this case (ECF No. 37 ) is GRANTED, to the extent that this order resolves all issues remaining in this case. Petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. The Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 08/24/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER striking 23 Letter from the record; granting petitioner 30 days to file his repy to the answer. (Reply due by 8/20/2014.) Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 7/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Respondents' 10 motion to dismiss, as follows: The motion to dismiss portions of Grounds 1 and 2 of federal habeas petition is denied. The motion to dismiss petitioner's 8 addi tional claim is granted. Petitioner's 8 additional claim of pre-plea error is dismissed with prejudice. Respondents shall file and serve an answer to Grounds 1 and 2 within 30 days, and Petitioner shall reply within 30 days the reafter. Any exhibits shall be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
August 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Clerk shall file and electronically serve petition 1 -1 upon respondents. Respondents shall have 45 days to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition (please see attached for further details). Henceforth, petitioner shall serve AG's Office copy of every submission to the court. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/22/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wingo v. Baca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Isidrio Baca
Represented By: Daniel M. Roche
Represented By: Catherine Cortez-Masto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Represented By: Daniel M. Roche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kirk D. Wingo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?