Case name not on file
Natalie Smith |
3:2013cv00476 |
September 6, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Robert C. Jones |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER denying 6 Smith's Objection. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/12/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING 5 Motion to preserve court security video tapes. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT. IT IS ORDERED that the telephone used in taking pictures of the Judge, Jury and parties during a trial proceeding and in violation of existing court orders, such telephone and camera is hereby forfeited to the United States. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/6/13. Please see attached for specific details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
In re: Natalie Smith | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.