Case name not on file
In Re: Natalie Smith
Case Number: 3:2013cv00476
Filed: September 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER denying 6 Smith's Objection. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/12/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
January 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DENYING 5 Motion to preserve court security video tapes. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
September 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT. IT IS ORDERED that the telephone used in taking pictures of the Judge, Jury and parties during a trial proceeding and in violation of existing court orders, such telephone and camera is hereby forfeited to the United States. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/6/13. Please see attached for specific details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Natalie Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?