Naples Polaris v. Peterson et al
| Naples Polaris |
| United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Val Peterson, Eugene Cleveland Canepa and WESTERN PROPERTIES OF NEVADA, LLC |
| 3:2013cv00511 |
| September 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. As between the successor in interest to Western Properties of Nevada LLC, Eugene Cleveland Canepa holds a 95.83 percent interest, and Val Peterson holds a 4.166 percent interest. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
52
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 5/14/2014, granting Trench Shoring Services, Inc.'s 34 Motion to Intervene. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 30 Motion for Discharge. By depositing $300,000 with this Court, Naples Polaris, LLC is DISCHARGED. Naples Polaris terminated. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/24/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDERED that the # 19 Motion to Intervene is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/10/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
