Zurich American Insurance Company et al v. Intermodal Maintenance Services, Inc.
| Discover Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Zurich American Insurance Company |
| Intermodal Maintenance Services, Inc. |
| 3:2013cv00512 |
| September 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Howard D. McKibben |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 78 Motion for Prejudgment Interest. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 9/3/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 43 Motion for Summary Judgment on its express indemnity and breach of contract claims - Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment in the amount of $2,589,313, together with interest at the lawful rate at the t ime of entry of judgment until paid in full; denying IMS's 50 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying IMS's 40 Motion to Dismiss for Spoliation of Evidence; granting Plaintiffs' 62 Motion for Leave to Supplement its Motion for Summary Judgment under F.R.C.P. 56(e); granting Plaintiffs' 53 and 58 Requests for Judicial Notice. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/20/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
