Castillo v. Legrand et al
| Gerardo Castillo |
| Legrand and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2013cv00704 |
| December 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to conduct discovery (ECF No. 59 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' first, second, and third motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF Nos. 61 , 62 , 63 ) are all DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall administratively close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/31/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER that petitioner' s motion to partially waive Local Rule IA 10-3(e) ECF No. 51 is GRANTED; petitioner's motion to file exhibit under sealECF No. 49 is GRANTED; respondents' motion for extension of time to file a response to the petition ECF No. 52 IS GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting Petitioner's ECF No. 31 Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition: Amended Petition due within 60 days. Response due within 45 days thereafter. Reply due within 30 days of response. Any exhibits to be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits to be forwarded, for this case, to staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING 17 Motion for reconsideration. FURTHER ORD that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/1/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for complete lack of exhaustion; denying a certificate of appealability. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and the final judgment on the NV AG, along with regenerated NEFs of the prior filings herein (served 6/20/2014). The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/20/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER - ORDERED that petitioner's # 12 Motion for an extension of time is GRANTED IN PART : Show Cause Response re 7 Order due by 7/12/2014. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motions (## 9 & 11 ) for appointment of counsel are DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/11/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Clerk shall file petition and accompanying motion for appointment of counsel. Within 30 days, petitioner shall show cause in writing why petition should not be dismissed for lack of exhaustion. Clerk shall make copies of materials list ed (see attached) from state supreme court's online docket record for No. 60480, shall docket the copies as electronic attachments to docket entry designated as court exhibit, and shall send petitioner copy of same. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/2/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
