Lyons v. Baca et al
Petitioner: William R. Lyons
Respondent: Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2014cv00173
Filed: April 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Howard D. McKibben
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER DENYING # 24 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. FURTHER ORD Clerk SHALL TRANSMIT this order to the 9th Circuit forthwith. (E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.) USCA case 15-15410 . Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/10/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting Respondents' 10 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing with prejudice the petition as untimely; denying Petitioner a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/22/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
December 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 16 motion for subpoena duces tecum; granting 18 motion for extension of time re 10 motion to dismiss (petitioner's response due within 20 days, respondents' reply due within 7 days thereafter); denying< /B> 19 motion to file supplemental points and authorities. No further extensions of time will be granted regarding briefing of 10 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 12/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
May 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - The # 4 IFP application is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORD that petitioner's # 5 Motion for counsel is DENIED. FURTHER ORD that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the # 2 Petition upon the respondents. (E-service 5/16/2014 via NE F regeneration.) FURTHER ORD that answer/response due by 6/30/2014. FURTHER ORD that any state court record exhibits shall be filed with a separate index as specified herein. The hard copy of all state court record exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in the Reno. FURTHER ORD henceforth P shall serve every document submitted for consideration upon AG, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 5/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lyons v. Baca et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Isidro Baca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William R. Lyons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?