JONES v. ALL AMERICAN AUTO PROTECTION, INC.
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. JONES
Defendant: ALL AMERICAN AUTO PROTECTION, INC.
Case Number: 3:2014cv00199
Filed: April 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: William G. Cobb
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER that plaintiffs' request for judgment ECF No. 125 is GRANTED; Clerk directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff Charles A. Jones and Plaintiff Josh Watson against Defendants All American Auto Protection, Inc., Harout Pambuckchyan, Raffi Sadejyan, and Jason Garcia in the amount of $6,000 for each. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
May 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER that plaintiff to file appropriate judgment against said defendants and submit same for signature by 5/19/2018. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
November 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDERED that Royal's # 89 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of Royal, and against Plaintiffs. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' # 103 Motion to Certify Class is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
September 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER adopting 55 Report and Recommendation; striking 22 All American Auto Protection, Inc.'s Answer; and directing Defendants All American, Pambuckchyan, Sadejyan, and Garcia to show cause within 20 days why the Court should not enter default judgment. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/9/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
August 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER on 93 Stipulation : Reply to 92 Response re 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment due by 9/7/2015. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/25/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER denying without prejudice 27 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/16/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting 48 motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff shall have 10 days to file the amended complaint attached as Exhibit 1 to the motion. (Amended Complaint deadline: 1/23/2015.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JONES v. ALL AMERICAN AUTO PROTECTION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALL AMERICAN AUTO PROTECTION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES A. JONES
Represented By: Peter D Durney
Represented By: Matthew Righetti
Represented By: Michael C. Righetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?