Blackwater et al vs Secretary of the Department of the Interior
| Rusty Coal Blackwater and Trent Lane Blackwater |
| The Secretary of the Department of Interior |
| Bureau of Indian Affairs |
| 3:2014cv00244 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDERED that Rusty Coal Blackwater and Trent Lane Blackwater's motion for an order compelling the defendants to enter into stipulation and order remanding to agency (ECF No. 18 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rusty Coal Blac kwater and Trent Lane Blackwater's motion for a final judgment (ECF No. 25 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case be DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting ECF No. 28 Attorney Sheryl Serreze's Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance as Counsel for Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING # 4 Motion for Voluntary Remand to Secretary of the Interior. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/5/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
