Parra v. Neven et al

Parra v. Neven et al

Petitioner:	Julio Smith Parra
Respondent:	Nevada Attorney General and D.W. Neven
Case Number:	3:2014cv00288
Filed:	June 4, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Reno Office
Presiding Judge:	Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge:	Howard D. McKibben
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 21, 2015	Filing 16 ORDER granting Respondents' 7 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing with prejudice the petition; denying a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
October 22, 2014	Filing 4 ORDER granting 1 IFP application; directing Clerk to file and e-serve the 1 -1 petition on respondents (NEFs sent 10/22/2014); directing respondents to file an answer to the petition within 45 days. Petitioner shall file and serve a reply within 45 days of answer. Any exhibits shall be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in Reno. Petitioner shall serve respondents copy of all pleadings and include certificate of service. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 21, 2015

Filing 16 ORDER granting Respondents' 7 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing with prejudice the petition; denying a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

October 22, 2014

Filing 4 ORDER granting 1 IFP application; directing Clerk to file and e-serve the 1 -1 petition on respondents (NEFs sent 10/22/2014); directing respondents to file an answer to the petition within 45 days. Petitioner shall file and serve a reply within 45 days of answer. Any exhibits shall be filed with separate index. Hard copies of any exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in Reno. Petitioner shall serve respondents copy of all pleadings and include certificate of service. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/22/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parra v. Neven et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: D.W. Neven
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Julio Smith Parra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?