Allen v. Cox et al
Petitioner: Gene A. Allen
Respondent: James G. Cox, Cathrine C Mesto and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2014cv00510
Filed: October 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER that the Motion for Judicial Action on Petition (ECF No. 93 ) and the Motion to Strike (ECF No. 97 ) are DENIED; the action is DISMISSED for failure to obey the Court's orders (See ECF Nos. 76 , 92 ); Clerk directed to enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
November 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER denying ECF No. 91 Motion to Dismiss; petitioner shall have (30) days to either: (1) inform court in a sworn declaration that he wishes to dismiss the petition without prejudice; OR (2) file a motion for a stay and abeyance; if petitioner fails to respond to the order, this case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
March 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER that Respondents' Motion to Dismiss ECF No. 55 is GRANTED; Petitioner shall have until 04/07/2017 to either: (1) inform the court in a sworn declaration that he wishes to dismiss this petition without prejudice in order to return to state, OR (2) file a motion for a stay and abeyance asking this Court to hold his federal petition in abeyance while he returns to state court; if Petitioner fails to respond to this order within the time permitted, this ca se may be dismissed. Petitioner's pro se Motions for Withdrawal of Counsel ECF Nos. 66 , 69 , 70 and 71 are all DENIED; Clerk SHALL STRIKE Petitioner's pro se filing styled "Rule 5(c) Notice" ECF No. 72 , Motion to Compel ECF No. 73 and Supplemental Pleading ECF No. 74 as fugitive documents. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 03/08/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
July 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER - Petitioners pro se motion for discovery (ECF No. 49 ) is STRICKEN. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's counseled second, third, and fourth unopposed motions for extension of time to file an amended petition (ECF Nos. 37 , 42 , [ 43]) are all GRANTED nunc pro tunc. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' first and second motions for extension of time to respond to the amended petition (ECF Nos. 50 and 52 ) are both GRANTED. Respondents shall file their response to the petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/18/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER - Counsel for P shall meet with P as soon as reasonably possible. Amended petition due by 9/14/2015; Answer due 30 days from service of answer; Reply due 30 days thereafter. Any additional state court exhibits shall be filed with index as specified herein; and paper copy to Reno "Staff Attorney." Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/16/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
May 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel. FPD appointed to represent petitioner. Clerk shall electronically serve FPD copy of this order with copy of amended petition 23 (served via NEF 5/7/15). FPD shall have 30 days to file noti ce of appearance or indicate inability to represent petitioner. Motion for docketing statement 27 and motion for status check 29 are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/7/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER directing petitioner to file a new petition on the court's form within 30 days; directing Clerk to send forms, instructions, and documents to petitioner (mailed 10/29/2014); denying petitioner's 10 application for entry of default; denying without prejudice petitioner's 18 motion for district judge to reconsider. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/29/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. Cox et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gene A. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James G. Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cathrine C Mesto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?