Sanchez v. State of Nevada et al
Amadeo Sanchez |
Cert Adams, Renee Baker, James Bruffy, Nevada Department of Corrections and Nevada, State Of |
3:2015cv00144 |
March 9, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Miranda M. Du |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER dismissing this action for failure to comply with 24 Order and denying as moot 22 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Filing 24 ORDER denying as moot 1 IFP application; directing Plaintiff to file updated address by 4/1/2016; directing Plaintiff, by 4/1/2016, to file complete IFP application or pay full $400 filing fee; directing Clerk to send this order, IFP fo rm and instructions to address on file for Plaintiff as well as to additional address specified (mailed 3/10/2016); staying action pending Plaintiff's compliance or non-compliance with this order. The Court will issue a subsequent order after 4/1/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/10/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 21 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 3/7/2016, granting 20 Motion to Withdraw. Motion to Dismiss 18 is withdrawn. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.