Wright v. Baker et al
| Dashaun Wright |
| Renee Baker, Ronald Blake, Jeremy Bray, Harold Byrne, Mark Drain, Michael Fletcher, Doctor Jackson, Daniel Keefe, Doctor Koehn, Maciej Krowlikowski, Rod Lightsey, Oxborrow, John Pulinik, Thomas Quinian and Michael Rodriguez |
| 3:2015cv00219 |
| April 20, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 5/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
12
AMENDED ORDER re 11 Order : If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies outlined in the # 6 Screening Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/21/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER - # 8 Motion for Immediate Relief is denied. # 9 Motion for Modification of Record is granted. The docket shall be corrected to reflect defendant "Ronald Bryant" instead of"Ronald Blake" and "Michael Oxborrow" instead of "Oxborrow." # 10 Motion for Stay is granted in part and denied in part : Amended complaint due 11/19/2015. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/20/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
