Curry v. Colvin
| John Curry |
| Carolyn W. Colvin and Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel |
| 3:2015cv00244 |
| May 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C §2412(d), in the amount of $4,753.57, subject to the terms of the Stipulation. Under the terms of the Stipulation, payment may be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 06/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 4/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER GRANTING # 15 Motion for Extension of Time : Response to # 12 Motion to Remand due by 1/20/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 1/6/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 12/7/2015, granting 13 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to 12 Motion to Remand to Agency. Responses due by 1/6/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
