Hardisty v. Colvin
Garrison Aaron Segar Hardisty |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel |
3:2015cv00265 |
May 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Larry R. Hicks |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER adopting and accepting ECF No. 30 Report and Recommendation; granting Plaintiff's ECF No. 24 Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 USC § 2412(d)(1)(A); granting Plaintiff's ECF No. 27 Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 USC § 406(b)(1). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 23 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 9/13/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 22 ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19 ) is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 13 ) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 17 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the ALJ for calculation and award of benefits. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this matter. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.