Nelson v. Baker et al
| Vernon W. Nelson, Jr. |
| Rene Baker and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2015cv00403 |
| August 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER granting ECF No. 18 Petitioner's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal. ECF No. 9 Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER - Clerk will file and electronically serve the # 2 Petition upon the respondents. ( E-service of # 2 Petition via NEF regeneration. ) The Clerk will add AG to the CM/ECF docket sheet as counsel for respondents. Answer/response to petition due by 1/17/2016. Any state court exhibits shall be filed with a separate index as specified herein; and hard copy forwarded to Reno staff attorneys. Henceforth P must serve AG a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/3/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 12/3/2015 to reflect copy of # 2 Petition mailed to P 12/3/2015 (DRM).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
