DuShane v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
| Jasen Lynn DuShane |
| Isidora Baca, S. L. Foster, M. Moses and Nevada Department of Corrections |
| 3:2015cv00501 |
| October 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER denying ECF Nos. 19 Motion for Extension of Time, 22 Motion to Strike, and 24 Motion in Support of Dismissal. It is further ordered, Plaintiff must not file any more documents in this closed case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 01/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDERED this action is dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to file an updated address in compliance with this Court's order (ECF No. 13 ). The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file updated address with the Court within 30 days; denying as moot ECF No. 12 Motion to Stay Early Mediation Conference. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/31/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
