Holden v. State of Nevada et al
| Jim Bass Holden |
| Senior Physician Romeo Aranas, R. Bruce Banniseter, James Greg Cox, Pamela Del Porto, William Donnelly, Fey, Ted Hanf, Jim Holmes, E.K. McDaniels, Nevada, State Of and Chuck Shardin |
| 3:2016cv00064 |
| February 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER granting ECF No. 100 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER that Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time for Settlement Conference (ECF No. 95 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER - The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 87 ) is accepted in part and rejected in part. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 78 ) is granted in part and denied in part : Summary judgment is granted in favor of Def endants on the portion of Count IV related to Hanf's failure to order a biopsy or other testing. Summary judgment is denied as to Counts I, II, III, V, VI, VII, VIII, and the portion of Count IV related to Hanf's failure to prescribe sunscr een. The following Defendants are dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service of process: Cegavske, Henson, Hipkin, Morrow, Stroud, and Holmes. Defendants' motion to extend time (ECF No. 89 ) is granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER granting ECF No. 82 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 78 Motion for Summary Judgment due by 3/28/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting ECF No. 74 Stipulation to Extend Deadline for Dispositive Motions to 2/14/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 2/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER that the reports and recommendations of Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb ECF Nos. 59 , 62 are accepted and adopted; Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ECF No. 32 isdenied; Defendants' motion to strike ECF No. 51 is granted in part and denied in part; Court will not strike Plaintiff's expert witness disclosure. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
62
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the District Judge enter an order GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ECF No. 51 Motion. Objections to R&R due by 10/12/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
59
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the District Judge enter an order DENYING ECF No. 32 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Objections to R&R due by 10/2/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 09/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting ECF No. 39 Stipulation : Responses to ECF No. 32 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, and to ECF 37 Amended MOTION for leave to file, due by Monday, May, 8, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
