Grant v. Byrne et al
Kenneth Maurice Grant |
Quentin Byrne and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2016cv00104 |
February 25, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Miranda M. Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER - It is ordered that Grant's second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 62 ) is denied. Grant's motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 88 , 89 ) are granted nunc pro tunc as of their respecti ve filing dates. A certificate of appealability is denied.The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/12/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SMR) |
Filing 87 ORDER - The Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Petition (ECF No. 82 ) is denied. Grant has 45 days from the date of this order to file a reply to Respondents' Answer (ECF No. 78 ). The pending Motions for Extension of Time (ECF Nos. 83 , 85 ) are granted nunc pro tunc as of their respective filings dates. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB) |
Filing 81 ORDER granting ECF No. 80 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 78 Answer to ECF No. 62 Second Amended Petition. Reply due by 2/26/2021. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/30/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 73 ORDER - Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 64 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Only Ground 1(D) of Petitioner's Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 62 ) is dismissed for the reasons discussed herein. With in 60 days of entry of this order, Respondents must file an answer addressing the remaining claims in the Second Amended Petition. Petitioner will have 45 days from service of the answer within which to file a reply. Petitioner's Motions for Extension of Time (ECF Nos. 67 , 68 ) are granted nunc pro tunc as of their respective filing dates. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/4/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB) |
Filing 45 ORDER granting nunc pro tunc ECF Nos. 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , and 43 Motions for extension of time. The scheduling order ECF No. 37 remains in effect. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 37 ORDER re ECF No. 36 Notice of Appearance by FPD. FPD has until 1/6/2018 to file an amended petition; response/answer to the petition due within 60 days thereafter; reply/opposition due 45 days after service of answer; any additional state court record exhibits filed herein; parties shall send copies of all exhibits to the Reno "Staff Attorney". See order for further details and instructions. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Filing 5 ORDER - Clerk file the petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for appointment of counsel and E-serve both, along with a copy of this order, on the respondents. ( E-service on 5/18/2016) The Clerk shall add AG as counsel for respondents. Re spondents shall have 60 days from the date of entry of this order to appear in this action, and to answer or otherwise respond to the petition. Reply due 60 days after service of answer. Response to motion to dismiss due 60 days from service of motion; reply due 30 days thereafter. Any additional state court exhibits shall be filed with separate index as specified herein, and hard copy sent to staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.