Jones v. Baker et al
Johnny Jones |
Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2016cv00114 |
February 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
William G. Cobb |
Miranda M. Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER - Respondents' motion for waiver of compliance with LR IA 10-3 (ECF No. 21 ) is granted. Respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13 ) is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice for petitioner's failure to exhaust his available state-court remedies. The clerk of the court will enter judgment accordingly and close this action. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 3 ORDER - ECF No. 1 IFP application is granted. Clerk shall file the petition. Clerk shall add AG as counsel for Rs. Clerk shall e-serve Rs the petition and this order; ( E-service 5/4/2016. ) and return copy of petition to P. (Mailed 5/4/2016.) Answ er due by 6/18/2016; reply due 45 days from service of answer. Any exhibits shall be filed with index as specified herein, and hard copy forwarded to Las Vegas staff attorneys. Henceforth P shall serve Rs a copy of every pleading, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/3/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.