Rodriguez v. McDaniels et al
Dario Rodriguez |
Renee Baker, J. Bissell, Inspector General Pam Del Porto, Adam Endel, E.K. McDaniels, Jake Murphy, Dwayne Neven and Daren Richards |
3:2016cv00143 |
March 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Miranda M. Du |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 115 ORDER - Judge Baldwin's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 114 ) is adopted in its entirety. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 101 ) is granted. Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this order and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/1/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB) |
Filing 108 ORDER granting ECF No. 107 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff shall have to and including Friday, February 21, 2020 to file an opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 101 ). No further extensions of time will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 2/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB) |
Filing 59 ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for further review (ECF No. 55 ) is denied; Defendants' motion for further instruction (ECF No. 56 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.