Knight II v. Sanchez et al
| Karl Knight II |
| J. Cossio, Ramm, R. Sanchez and A. Tracey |
| 3:2016cv00149 |
| March 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER dismissing with prejudice this action per ECF No. 36 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing that this action will proceed on the Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Sanchez and the Fourth Amendment strip search claim against Cossio, Ramm, Sanchez, and Tracey; directing Clerk to issue summonses for Cossio , Ramm, Sanchez, and Tracey and deliver them along with ECF No. 5 Complaint and this order to the USM for service; directing Clerk to send Plaintiff four USM-285 forms (mailed 11/8/2016); giving Plaintiff 30 days to complete and r eturn forms to USM. Notice re unserved defendants due within 20 days after receiving USM-285 forms from USM showing whether service has been accomplished. Plaintiff shall serve defendants copy of all pleadings and include certificate of service. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 11/7/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
