Lindrum v. Colvin
| Scott Aaron Lindrum |
| Carolyn Colvin |
| Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel |
| 3:2016cv00230 |
| April 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ECF No. 31 is adopted and accepted; plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ECF No. 28 is GRANTED; plaintiff is AWARDED $4,889.44; the award to be paid by the government directly to plaintiff's counsel; Clerk directed to enter judgement. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22 ) is adopted and accepted, and plaintiff's motion for reversal or remand (ECF No. 9 ) is GRANTED in part and this matter is REMANDED for further development consistent wi th the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's cross-motion to affirm (ECF No. 19 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this matter. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/15/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
