Williams v. Reno Police Department et al
Thomas L. Williams |
Wesley Keller, Scott Rasmussen, Reno Police Department, David Tallman and Jet Utter |
3:2016cv00281 |
May 26, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Robert C. Jones |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge ECF No. 21 ; that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint ECF No. 18 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; the Clerk directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 08/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 22 ORDER denying plaintiff's ECF No. 20 Motion for expeditious examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 7/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 9 ). IFP Applications (ECF Nos. 1 , 7 0 are GRANTED. Clerk shall file the Complaint (ECF No. 1 -1). The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to Coun ts I and II against all defendants. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as to Count III against Tallman, Utter, and the Reno Police Department. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.