Fields v. Baker et al
Petitioner: John Vernon Fields
Respondent: Renee Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2016cv00298
Filed: June 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Miranda M. Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER - Petitioner's writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 15 ) is denied; Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability; Clerk directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
April 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER denying Petitioner's ECF No. 52 Emergency Motion for Release Pending Decision Due to Risks of Infection by COVID-19. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/20/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
April 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER re ECF No. 52 Emergency Motion, directing Respondents to file and serve a response within three days of the date that this order is entered; Petitioner to reply within five days of response. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER that Respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 40 ) is granted nunc pro tunc; Petitioner's two motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF Nos. 43 , 44 ) are both granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
December 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER that Respondents' motion to dismiss certain grounds in the petition (ECF No. 21 ) is granted as follows: (1) grounds 2, 3, and 4 are dismissed as untimely; and (2) ground 5 is unexhausted; Petitioner shall have until 1/19/2019 to respond as outlined in order; if Petitioner elects to abandon his unexhausted grounds, Respondents shall have 30 days from the date of service to file an answer; Petitioner shall have 30 days following service of Respondents' answer in which to file a reply; if Petitioner fails to respond to this order within the time permitted, this case may be dismissed; Respondents' motion for leave to file exhibits under seal (ECF No. 25 ) is granted; Petitioner's first and second mot ions for extension of time to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss (ECF Nos. 27 , 29 ) are both granted nunc pro tunc; Petitioner's motion for leave to file exhibits under seal (ECF No. 32 ) is granted; and Respon dents' first and second motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss (ECF Nos. 34 , 36 ) are both granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
February 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting nunc pro tunc ECF Nos. 11 , 12 , 13 Motions to Extend Time to File Amended Petition; granting ECF No. 17 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 15 Amended Petition: Respondents' response due within 35 days. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
December 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - Counsel for petitioner will meet with petitioner as soon as reasonably possible as specified herein. Amended petition due by 3/19/2016. Answer due 45 days after service of amended petition; Response to answer due 30 days thereafter. Any state court exhibits shall be filed with an index as specified, and courtesy copies Reno Staff Attorney. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/19/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
November 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing Clerk to add NV AG as counsel for Respondents and to file and e-serve them with ECF No. 1 -1 Petition (NEF sent 11/14/2016); directing Clerk to file the ECF No. 1 -2 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; granting the Motion for Appointment of Counsel and appointing FPD to represent Petitioner; directing Clerk to e-serve FPD with this order and the petition (NEFs sent 11/14/2016); giving FPD 30 days to file notice of appearance or indicate its inability to do so. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; copy also mailed to Petitioner - KR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fields v. Baker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Renee Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Vernon Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?