Carey v. Baca et al
| Tony Carey |
| Isidro Baca, Nurse Darline, Fryre and John Keast |
| 3:2016cv00362 |
| June 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
DISMISSAL BY COURT FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. Action dismissed without prejudice. Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) Modified on 2/26/2019 (KW).
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER - Plaintiff's IFP application (ECF No. 1 ) is GRANTED, however, the full filing fee must still be paid. NDOC shall pay Clerk from inmate account. Clerk shall SEND copy this order to Finance and to NDOC inmate service. ( Email (NEF) t o Finance; copy to NDOC on 4/20/2017.) Clerk shall SERVE AG this order and complaint (ECF No. 5 ). ( E-service 5/20/217; complaint via NEF regeneration.) AG shall file notice re acceptance of service by 5/11/2017; and file under seal address(es) for Ds for which service not accepted. P shall file a motion re any unserved Ds. If service accepted then answer/response due by 6/19/2017. Henceforth P shall serve Ds a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
