Garner v. Nash et al
| Edward Eugene Garner |
| Fierro, Mumpower and Warden Nash |
| 3:2016cv00410 |
| July 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER that the Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ECF No. 6 and the Motion to Extend Time ECF No. 4 are DENIED as moot; the Motion to Cure Deficiencies ECF No. 5 and the Motion of Clarification ECF No. 7 are GRANTED IN PART; the Complaints ECF Nos. 1 -1 and 1 -3) are STRICKEN as redundant; Clerk directed to DETACH and FILE the Complaint ECF No. 1 -2; the Complaint is DISMISSED; the Clerk shall enter judgment and close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 03/08/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER - # 1 IFP Application is DENIED without prejudice to file a new application. Clerk SHALL SEND P approved IFP form and instructions. (Mailed 7/12/2016.) IFP or $400 filing fee due by 8/11/2016. Amended complaint or Notice to close this cas e due by 8/11/2016. Clerk shall send P 1983 form and instructions; and copy of his complaints ECF No. 1 -1, 2, 3. (Mailed 7/12/2016) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 7/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
