O'Keefe v. LeGrand
Petitioner: Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Respondent: Robert LeGrand
Case Number: 3:2016cv00430
Filed: July 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Miranda M. Du
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER denying Petitioner's ECF No. 48 IFP Application. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
December 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER denying as moot ECF Nos. 32 Motion to Transfer, 33 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, and 38 Motion for certificate for appealability. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER - Respondents' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15 ) is granted in part with respect to the change of forum and denied in part with respect to all other requests. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court will transfer this acti on to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, 85 Marconi Blvd., Room 121, Columbus, OH 43215. It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court administratively close this action. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - P's motion for relief (ECF No. 5 ) is granted. Clerk is directed to reopen this action. Clerk shall file the petition. Clerk shall add AG as counsel for Rs. Clerk shall electronically serve Rs a copy of the petition and this order. (E-service 10/14/2016.) Clerk shall return to P a copy of the petition. (Mailed 10/14/2016.) Answer/response petition due by 11/28/2016. Any exhibits filed by the parties must be filed with a separate index of exhibits as specified herein. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits must be forwarded for this case to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Henceforth P must serve upon Rs a copy of every pleading, submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of s ervice. Clerk of the Court send a copy of this order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 16-16546. (Email (NEF) sent to 9th Ckt. on 10/14/2016.) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/13/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 10/14/2016 to correct file date (DRM).
August 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 8/5/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Keefe v. LeGrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert LeGrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?